Two California girls declare Subway’s tuna sandwich really incorporates not a “scintilla” of the fish — and that they have been duped by the fast-food joint’s claims, a brand new $5 million lawsuit alleges.
[While questions have arisen before about the quality and wholesomeness of Subway ingredients, $5 million seems like a bit much. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. In the meantime, we advise avoiding ALL fast food, Subway included. – HH]
Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin say they ordered tuna from the sandwich big at areas close to their house as not too long ago as final 12 months, in keeping with a federal lawsuit filed within the Northern District of California final week.
However “unbiased testing has repeatedly affirmed, the merchandise are constituted of something however tuna,” the court docket papers allege.
Actually, Subway’s tuna is “constituted of a mix of varied concoctions that don’t represent tuna, but have been blended collectively by defendants to mimic the looks of tuna,” the court docket paperwork declare.
Subway has completed this in an effort to save cash for the reason that blended non-tuna product prices much less, the submitting alleges.
“Conscious that customers place a heightened worth on tuna as an ingredient, defendants intentionally make false and deceptive claims concerning the composition of the merchandise to extend income on the expense of unsuspecting patrons,” the go well with fees.
Dhanowa and Amin “have been tricked into shopping for meals gadgets that wholly lacked the ingredient they moderately thought they have been buying,” the court docket papers allege.
If that they had recognized the reality, they wouldn’t have purchased Subway’s tuna or they’d have paid a lot much less for it, the go well with says.
They’ve introduced claims of fraud, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment towards the corporate …
A Subway spokesperson referred to as the claims “baseless” and “frivolous,” including that they “are being pursued with out sufficient investigation.”
“Subway will vigorously defend itself towards these and some other baseless efforts to mischaracterize and tarnish the high-quality merchandise that Subway and its franchisees … ”